Journal Article

Reaching a climate agreement: compensating for energy market effects of climate policy

Authors

  • Sonja Peterson
  • Matthias Weitzel
Publication Date

Because of large economic and environmental asymmetries among world regions and the incentive to free ride, an international climate regime with broad participation is hard to reach. Most of the proposed regimes are based on an allocation of emissions rights that is perceived as fair. Yet, there are also arguments to focus more on the actual welfare implications of different regimes and to focus on a ‘fair’ distribution of resulting costs. In this article, the computable general equilibrium model DART is used to analyse the driving forces of welfare implications in different scenarios in line with the 2 °C target. These include two regimes that are often presumed to be ‘fair’, namely a harmonized international carbon tax and a cap and trade system based on the convergence of per capita emissions rights, and also an ‘equal loss’ scenario where welfare losses relative to a business-as-usual scenario are equal for all major world regions. The main finding is that indirect energy market effects are a major driver of welfare effects and that the ‘equal loss’ scenario would thus require large transfer payments to energy exporters to compensate for welfare losses from lower world energy demand and prices.

Kiel Institute Expert

Info

JEL Classification
D58, H22, H23, H87, Q48, Q52
DOI
10.1080/14693062.2015.1064346

Key Words

  • burden sharing
  • emission trading
  • Emissionshandel
  • Energiemarkt
  • Energy market
  • International climate Regime
  • Outcome-based allocation
  • Steuern
  • taxes

Related Topics