Economic models of land allocation may lead to expectations for farmer response that “surprisingly"
do not materialize, if market prices fail to reflect the value of farmers' product. “Shadow prices" rather
than market prices explain resource allocation better for farmers who attach significant non-market
values to their own crops. I extend the theoretical model in Arslan and Taylor (2008) to explain why
the land allocation of such farmers may not respond to market signals even if transaction costs are not
binding. I estimate the proportion of land subsistence maize farmers allocate to traditional versus
modern maize varieties using nationally representative rural household data from Mexico – the center
of diversity of maize. I conclude that shadow prices explain land allocation better than market prices
and discuss the importance of non-market values in understanding both farmers' supply response and
on-farm conservation of traditional crops with non-market values.