International Climate Policy
Zusammenfassung
A (traditional) focus of the research area is on analyzing prevailing policy proposals at the European and international level. Policies that have been and are analyzed with respect to their effects and their optimal design are in particular the European emission trading scheme, policies associated with the Kyoto Protocol and possible Post-Kyoto long-term climate regimes.
The DART Model
The DART model was developed in the late 90's at the department of environmental and resource economics at the Kiel Institute for World Economics. It is a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the world economy, covering multiple sectors and regions. It is designed for the analysis of international climate policies.
The DART model is not only used for analyzing prevailing international climate policy proposals, but a major part of research in the area is aimed at improving and extending the DART model. Currently, the model is e.g. up-dated to the newest available database GTAP7.
POEM - Policy Options to engage Emerging Asian economies in a Post-Kyoto regime
The main aim of the POEM project (funded by the 7th framework program of the EU) is to anaylse the possibility of reaching both development and climate objectives in India and China. The hypothesis is that it is only possible to reach both objectives by combining policies and measures at international and at national level, supported by committed international cooperation. |
The methodology of the project is based on the development and assessment of policy options, including combinations of international and national policies, and institutional frameworks for international cooperation under a post-2012 regime. A number of different computational models is the primary tool that will be used by the POEM project partners, the IfW contributes with the DART model. The project is based on the application of an integrated modeling framework, and the study will use this integrated modeling framework in order to explore possible multiple pathways contributing to climate action without compromising development priorities.
ACCEPT – What determines people’s willingness to accept new climate change mitigation options?
Combating climate change poses a major challenge to governments, industry and society. Since international negotiations on emission reduction agreements have had limited success so far, governments have started considering, among other things, new options that may help mitigating climate change. Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) and climate engineering (CE) are such options. Before testing or implementing any of these instruments, costs and benefits as well as the associated risks need to be evaluated. However, even if some options were found suitable, another crucial element for actual implementation would be public acceptance and people’s willingness to accept (WTA) these measures. People’s assessment and therefore their WTA any or all of these new climate change mitigation options is crucially influenced by their beliefs and emotions, by their risk perception and trust in institutions as well as by their risk aversion and ambiguity aversion.
The project intends to broaden the scientific knowledge of the issue by obtaining comprehensive empirical evidence on the determinants of people’s WTA and to close an existing research gap focusing on Germany. Such information is essential for designing an optimal portfolio of mitigation options. The research is funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF).
CLIMA-U - Climate change mitigation and adaptation under uncertainty
The project CLIMA-U investigates the impact of multiple uncertainties on the policy choice of climate change mitigation and adaptation. With a significant component of numerical analysis, the project aims to provide quantitative benchmarks for the policy planning to address the dual challenge of uncertain climate change and economic growth of development countries.
CORE - Cooperative Regimes for Future Climate Policy
Attempts to implement 2°C-target-compatible emission reductions via international cooperation have not been very successful so far, as evidenced by the Kyoto Protocol and the negotiations on a post-Kyoto agreement. The CORE project analyses whether global cooperation is possible under the current setting of international negotiations on climate change, i.e. if it is possible to design a climate regime where long-term climate targets may be met and all countries agree on the distribution of reduction efforts. This is done using cooperative game theory in combination with a computable general equilibrium model, taking into account the uncertainty about key mitigation technologies. The theoretical model is supplemented by a field experiment with actual stakeholders in the climate negotiations and a controlled laboratory experiment.
The project is carried out jointly with the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI and the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
Desert Power Industrial Initiative – Modeling sectoral and regional impacts of renewable electricity production in the MENA region
The project aims to assess sectoral and regional macroeconomic impacts of solar and wind energy production in the EU, Middle East and North Africa (EUMENA) until 2050. It is commissioned by the Desert Power Industrial Initiative (Dii) that enables an industrial scale market for renewable energy in MENA by formulating a long-term vision, designing a regulatory framework and translating it into concrete reference projects.
The Dii’s strategic framework of an EUMENA integrated power system shows that in an interconnected power system the overall power system costs are lower than in two isolated regional power systems. This is essentially due to the vast solar and wind potentials in MENA and the complementary supply and demand structures in the south and the north of the Mediterranean Sea in all seasons.
More information is available here.
EXPECT: An experimental study of climate policy negotiations - Implications for policy design and impact assessment
Aim of the project is to combine methods of experimental economics with applied general equilibrium modeling in order to analyze how decision makers behave in prisoner dilemma situations adapted to contain elements of collective risk such as in climate change. We are interested in the determinants of cooperation which are important for climate negotiations.
In this project we adapt a public good game to inherit some characteristics of climate change. If the group as a whole is able to reach a given threshold, dangerous climate change is avoided – if the target is not met, participants risk losing a part of their assets with a given probability. In the series of experiments, we vary certain parameters to see how cooperation is changed. Most importantly, we introduce asymmetries which clearly play a role in the current climate negotiations. In the course of the experiments we also want to test whether students behave differently than more experienced decision makers, hence we run experiments both at the lab at the University of Kiel and at the Global Economic Symposium.
Completed Projects
Recent Publications
-
2013
- Kretschmer, B., Hübler, M., Nunnenkamp, P. (2013). Does Foreign Aid Reduce Energy and Carbon Intensities of Developing Economies?. Journal of International Development, 25 (1), 67-91.
- Murray, T., Maddison, D., Rehdanz, K. (2013). Do Geographical Variations in Climate Influence Life Satisfaction? . Climate Change Economics, Volume 4, Issue 01, 21 pp..
- Petrick, S. (2013). Carbon Efficiency, Technology, and the Role of Innovation Patterns: Evidence from German Plant-Level Microdata. Kiel Working Paper, 1833, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 23 pp.
- Schröder, C., Rehdanz, K., Narita, D., Okubo, T. (2013). Household Formation and Residential Energy Demand: Evidence from Japan. Kiel Working Paper, 1836, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 36 pp.
-
2012
- Bertram, C., Heitmann, N., Narita, D., Schwedeler, M. (2012). How will Germany’s CCS Policy Affect the Development of a European CO2 Transport Infrastructure?. Kiel Policy Brief, 43, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 12 pp.
- Emadodin, I., Narita, D., Bork, H. (2012). Soil degradation and agricultural sustainability: an overview from Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability , 14 (5), Springer, 611-625 pp.
- Heitmann, N., Bertram, C., Narita, D. (2012). Embedding CCS infrastructure into the European electricity system: a policy coordination problem. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9360-z, Springer.
- Heitmann, N., Peterson, S. (2012). The Potential Contribution of the Shipping Sector to an Efficient Reduction of Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Kiel Working Paper, 1813, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 36 pp.
- Hsiang, S., Narita, D. (2012). Adaptation to Cyclone Risk: Evidence from the Global Cross-Section. Climate Change Economics, Volume 03, Issue 02, 28 pp.
- Johansson, D., Lucas, P., Weitzel, M., Ahlgren, E., Bazaz, A., Chen, W., den Elzen, M., Ghosh, J., Liang, Q., Peterson, S., Pradhan, B., van Ruijven, B., Shukla, P., van Vuuren, D., Wei, Y. (2012). Multi-model analyses of the economic and energy implications for China and India in a post-Kyoto climate regime. Kiel Working Paper, 1808, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 36 pp.
- Leisner, T., Oschlies, A., Rickels, W. (2012). Lässt sich die Erde künstlich kühlen?. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 4/2012
- Narita, D., Quaas, M. (2012). Adaptation to Climate Change and Climate Variability: Do It Now or Wait and See?. Kiel Working Paper, 1809, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 31 pp.
- Rickels, W., Görlich, D., Oberst, G., Peterson, S. (2012). Carbon Price Dynamics – Evidence from Phase II of the European Emission Trading Scheme. Kiel Working Paper, 1804, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel
- Thomas, L., Andreas, O., Rickels, W. (2012). Lässt sich die Erde künstlich kühlen?. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 4/2012
- van Ruijven, B., Weitzel, M., den Elzen, M., Hof, A., van Vuuren, D., Peterson, S., Narita, D. (2012). Emission allowances and mitigation costs of China and India resulting from different effort-sharing approaches. Energy Policy, 46, 116–134.
- Weitzel, M., Peterson, S. (2012). Border Carbon Adjustment: Not a Very Promising Climate Policy Instrument. Kiel Policy Brief, 55, 10 pp.
- Weitzel, M. (2012). Comment on ‘‘Comparing the feed-in tariff incentives for renewable electricity in Ontario and Germany’’ by Mabee, Mannion, and Carpenter. Energy Policy, 44, 485-486.
- Weitzel, M., Ghosh, J., Peterson, S., Pradhan, B., , (2012). Effects of international climate policy for India: Evidence from a national and global CGE model. Kiel Working Paper, 1810, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 32 pp.
- Weitzel, M., Hübler, M., Peterson, S. (2012). Fair, Optimal or Detrimental? Environmental vs. Strategic Use of Border Carbon Adjustment. Kiel Working Paper, 1792, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 29 pp.
- Weitzel, M., Hübler, M., Peterson, S. (2012). Fair, Optimal or Detrimental? Environmental vs. Strategic Use of Carbon-based Border Measures. Energy Economics, 34(S2), S198-S207.
- Weitzel, M., Calzadilla, A. (2012). Reassessing Renewable Energy. Kiel Policy Brief, 49, 12 pp..
-
2011
- Golub, A., Narita, D., Schmidt, M. (2011). Uncertainty in integrated assessment models of climate change: alternative analytical approaches. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Papers, 553, The Berkely Electronic Press (bepress), 23 pp.
- Golubb, A., Narita, D., Schmidt, M. (2011). Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Models of Climate Change: Alternative Analytical Approaches. Climate Change, 24 pp.
- Klepper, G. (2011). The future of the European Emission Trading System and the Clean Development Mechanism in a post-Kyoto world. Energy Economics, 33 (4), 687-698 pp.
- Klepper, G., Rickels, W. (2011). The Real Economics of Climate Engineering.
- Narita, D., Wagner, U. (2011). Expectation-Driven Climate Treaties with Breakthrough Technologies. Kiel Working Paper, 1732, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 30 pp.
- Rickels, W., Klepper, G., Dovern, J., Betz, G., Nadine, B., Cacean, S., Güssow, K., Heintzenberg, J., Hiller, S., Hoose, C., Leisner, T., Oschlies, A., Platt, U., Proelß, A., Renn, O., Schäfer, S., Zürn, M. (2011). Large-Scale Intentional Intervention s into the Climate System? Assessing the Climate Engineering Debate. Scoping report conducted on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Kiel Earth Institute, Kiel
- Weitzel, M., Peterson, S. (2011). The carbon content of trade: Under border tariff adjustments and a global carbon regime. 20 pp.
-
2010
- Hübler, M. (2010). Avoiding the Trap: The Dynamic Interaction of North-South Capital Mobility and Technology Diffusion. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, Taylor & Francis.
- Hübler, M., Keller, A. (2010). Energy Savings via FDI? Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries. Environment and Development Economics, 15(1), Cambridge Journals, 59-80.
- Khalilian, S., Fröse, R., Prölß, A., Requate, T. (2010). Designed for Failure: A Critique of the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Union. Marine Policy, 34(6), 1178-1182.
- Kretschmer, B., Hübler, M., Nunnenkamp, P. (2010). Does Foreign Aid Reduce Energy and Carbon Intensities in Developing Countries. Kiel Working Paper, 1598, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, 28 pp..
- Meier, H., Rehdanz, K. (2010). Determinants of Residential Space Heating Expenditures in Great Britain. Elsevier, 949-959 .
- Narita, D. (2010). Climate Policy as Expectation Management?. Kiel Working Paper, 1624, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 17 pp.
- Narita, D., Tol, R., Anthoff, D. (2010). International climate policy and regional welfare weights. Environmental Science and Policy, Elsevier, 713-720 pp.
- Petrick, S., Rehdanz, K., Wagner, U. (2010). Interactions between selected energy use and production characteristics of German manufacturing plants.
- Petrick, S., Rehdanz, K., Tol, R. (2010). The Impact of Temperature Changes on Residential Energy Consumption. Kiel Working Paper, 1618, Kiel, 33 p..
- Rickels, W., Görlich, D., Peterson, S., Oberst, G. (2010). Explaining European Emission Allowance Price Dynamics: Evidence from Phase II. Kiel Working Paper, 1650, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 24 pp.
- Rickels, W., Kleemann, L., Klepper, G., Peterson, S., Petrick, S. (2010). Konjunktur für den Klimaschutz? Klima- und Wachstumswirkung weltweiter Konjunkturprogramme. Aussenwirtschaft, 2010 II, Universität St. Gallen, 30 pp..
- Tabrizy, S., Trofimenko, N. (2010). Scope for Export-Led Growth in a Large Emerging Economy: Is India Learning by Exporting?. Kiel Working Paper, 1633, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 28 pp.
- Trofimenko, N. (2010). Factors Affecting Location Decisions of the Economic Headliners – Exporters and Foreign-Owned Firms – in China. Kiel Working Paper, 1645, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 21 pp.
- van Ruijven, B., Weitzel, M., den Elzen, M., van Vuuren, D., Peterson, S., Narita, D. (2010). Assessment of the impacts of different post‐Kyoto regime proposals on China and India. 71 pp.
-
2009
- Hübler, M. (2009). Can Carbon Based Import Tariffs Effectively Reduce Carbon Emissions?. Kiel Working Paper, 1565, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 26 pp.
- Hübler, M. (2009). Energy Saving Technology Diffusion via FDI and Trade: A CGE Model of China. Kiel Working Paper, 1479, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 40 pp.
- Hübler, M., Lontzek, T. (2009). The Optimal Transfer of Capital and Embodied Technologies to Developing Countries. Kiel Working Paper, 1478, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 30 pp.
- Khadjavi, M., Peterson, S., Petrick, S., Rickels, W. (2009). No Money Left for Climate Protection? Climate Policy after the Crisis.
- Khalilian, S. (2009). The WTO and Environmental Provisions: Three Categories of Trade and Environment Linkage. Kiel Working Paper, 1485, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 26 pp.
- Klepper, G., Peterson, S., Rickels, W., Kopmann, A., Weitzel, M. (2009). Gutachten zu Perspektiven der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Forschung zum Klimawandel.
- Klepper, G. (2009). The Future of ETS and CDM in a post-Kyoto World. 30 pp.
- Lindner, S., Peterson, S., Windhorst, W. (2009). An economic and environmental Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Power Plants – a Case Study for the City of Kiel. Kiel Working Paper, 1527
- Lontzek, T., Narita, D. (2009). The effect of uncertainty on decision making about climate change mitigation. A numerical approach of stochastic control. Kiel Working Paper, 1539, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 19 pp.
- Narita, D., Tol, R., Anthoff, D. (2009). International Climate Policy and Regional Welfare Weights. ESRI Working Paper, 332, ESRI, Dublin, 31 pp.
- Rickels, W., Kleemann, L., Klepper, G., Peterson, S., Petrick, S. (2009). Konjunktur für den Klimaschutz? Klima- und Wachstumswirkungen weltweiter Konjunkturprogramme. Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 30 Seiten.
-
2008
- Di Maria, C., Van der Werf, E. (2008). Carbon Leakage Revisited: Unilateral Limate Policy with Directed Technical Change. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39 (2), 55-74.
- Gundlach, E., de Vaal, A. (2008). Technological Change, Trade, and Endogenous Factor Endowments. Kiel Working Paper, 1471, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 14 pp.
- Hübler, M., Keller, A. (2008). Energy Savings via FDI? Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries. Kiel Working Paper, 1393, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 27 pp.
- Hübler, M. (2008). The Labor Market Effects of Outsourcing Parts and Components: A Simple Model with Cournot Competition. Aussenwirtschaft, 63(2), Rüegger, 167-194.
- Lontzek, T., Rickels, W. (2008). Carbon Capture and Storage & the Optimal Path of the Carbon Tax. Kiel Working Paper, 1475, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 35 pp.
- Maddison, D., Rehdanz, K. (2008). Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth: Homogeneous Causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Kiel Working Paper, 1437, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 32 pp.
- Meier, H., Rehdanz, K. (2008). Determinants of residential space heating expenditures in Great Britain. Kiel Working Paper, 1439, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 23 pp..
- Peterson, S. (2008). Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Developing Countries Through Technology Transfer? - A Survey of Empirical Evidence. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 13(3), 283-305.
- Peterson, S. (2008). Intensity Targets: Implications for the economic uncertainties of emissions trading. Bernd Hansjürgens & Ralf Antes (eds), Economics and Management of Climate Change - Risks, Mitigation and Adaptation . Springer, New York.
- Peterson, S., Klepper, G. (2008). The competitiveness effects of the EU climate policy. Kiel Working Paper, 1464, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 35 pp.
- Rehdanz, K., Tol, R. (2008). A No Cap But Trade Proposal for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets for Brazil, China and India. Climate Policy, 8, 293-304.
- Rehdanz, K., Stöwhase, S. (2008). Cost Liability and Residential Space Heating Expenditures of Welfare Recipients in Germany. 329-345.
- van Zon, A., Lontzek, T. (2008). R&D-driven Biases in Energy-Saving Technical Change: A "Putty-Practically-Clay" Approach. Kiel Working Paper, 1474, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 39 pp.
-
2007
- Hübler, M. (2007). A Simple Model of Outsourcing with Cournot Competition. Kiel Working Paper, 1320, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 28 pp.
- Peterson, S., Klepper, G. (2007). Distribution Matters - Taxes vs. Emissions Trading in Post Kyoto Climate Regimes. Kiel Working Paper, 1380, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 26 pp.
- Peterson, S., Ellersdorfer, I., Lutz, C., Zürn, M. (2007). Preisabhängiger technischer Fortschritt in Energiewirtschaftsmodellen. In: Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen in Deutschland (Hrsg.) (eds), Energiemodelle zu Innovation und moderner Energietechnik. Mensch und Buch Verlag, München.
- Rickels, W., Duscha, V., Keller, A., Peterson, S. (2007). The determinants of allowance prices in the European Emissions Trading Scheme - Can we expect an efficient allowance market 2008?. Kiel Working Paper, 1387, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 26 pp.
- Van der Werf, E. (2007). Production Functions for Climate Policy Modeling: An Empirical Analysis. Kiel Working Paper, 1316, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, 30 pp.
- Zürn, M., Lutz, C., Kremers, H., Peterson, S., Schumacher, K. (2007). Abbildung exogenen technischen Fortschritts in Ökonomiemodellen. In: Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen in Deutschland. Mensch und Buch Verlag, München.
-
2006
- Klepper, G., Peterson, S. (2006). Emissions Trading, CDM, JI, and More: The Climate Strategy of the EU. The Energy Journal, 27 (2), 1-26.
- Peterson, S. (2006). Efficient Abatement in Separated Carbon Markets: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Kiel Working Paper, 1271, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 24 pp.
- Peterson, S. (2006). Technischer Fortschritt im DART-Modell. In: I. Ellersdorfer und U. Fahl (eds), Ansätze zur Modellierung von Innovation in der Energiewirtschaft. Lit Verlag, Münster/Hamburg/Berlin/Wien/London/Zürich.
- Peterson, S. (2006). The European Emissions Trading Scheme and its Competitiveness Effects for European Business - Results from the CGE Model DART. Antes, R., Hansjürgens, B., Lemathe, P. (eds), Emissions Trading and Business 1. Physika/ Springer, Heidelberg.
- Peterson, S. (2006). Uncertainty and Economic Analysis of Climate Change: A Survey of Approaches and Findings. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 11(1), 1-17.
-
2005
- Klepper, G., Peterson, S. (2005). Emissions Trading, CDM, JI, and More - The Climate Strategy of the EU. Kiel Working Paper, 1238, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 43 pp.
- Klepper, G., Peterson, S. (2005). Trading Hot-Air: The Influence of Permit Allocation Rules, Market Power, and the US Withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental & Resource Economics, 32(2), 205-227.
- Peterson, S. (2005). Ergebnisse des DART-Modells. In: Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen in Deutschland (eds), Reihe Umwelt- und Ressourcenökonomik. Lit-Verlag, München.
-
- Lindner, S., Peterson, S., Windhorst, W. An economic and environmental Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Power Plants – a Case Study for the City of Kiel .
- Trofimenko, N. Scope for Export-Led Growth in a Large Emerging Economy: Is India Learning by Exporting?.